On 12/14/2016 6:32 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
It depends. My E-1 has 4X the pixels it needs for 80% of the shooting I do.
But I am glad to have cameras that have a few bazillion more pixels too.
The primary advantage to the XT2 is that it is a better camera than the
XT1. That it also happens to have a better sensor is just a bonus.
Please, define and quantify "better" with precision and clarity. If the
"better" sensor is just a bonus, namely a last event throw-in feature,
what are the other substantive "better" features that individually and
collectively make the X-T2 a "better" picture taking device than the X-T1.
jh
AG
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does the X-T2 body at ~US$1,600 really warrant such a high sticker price
as compared to the more modestly priced X-T1 body? The sensor's rating at
~25MP is 50% greater than the X-T1's sensor but unless one is looking to
produce images the size of the side of a London double decker bus I cannot
imagine that the ~25MP sensor carries anything other than bragging rights!
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|