TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Olympus E-3

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-3
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:16:12 +0200
I seem to remember it vaguely, had it at some point but not too long. Like the 
other 4/3 cameras, it just did not make sense in terms of size of camera vs. 
size of the sensor. The MFT cameras like my current Panasonic GX80 and GM5 do 
deliver on that promise—good image quality with small cameras.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>

YNWA

"I’m not arguing, I’m just explaining why I’m right"












> On 17 Jun 2020, at 16:16, Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>     I've noticed a few E-3 bodies being offered on evilBay lately, and after 
> looking at the specs I'm wondering if there is any real advantage over the 
> E-520.  Anyone have any hands-on experience with the two?
> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro 
>     - Hunter S. Thompson
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>