Foxy wrote:
>I've heard a bit about the Canon EOS system. So I got a brochure or two
from
>a camera shop in Albury today. And I thought the OM-2SP was complex!
>
>This is a photo system I don't want (not that I ever thought of changing).
>Manual? What's that?. If you don't make rockets for NASA, the camera looks
>too complex for you. Hey, I think the OM-3Ti is a bit too complex. I had to
>cuddle my OM-1n after reading the brochure. I never thought focus, aperture
>and shutter speed were so complex.
>
>After the comments posted by Ansel Adams, the irony of this system stands
>out to me.
>
>Just thought I would post someting after seeing this info.
>
>Brrr (trying to do a body shake due to fear).
I do agree with you, at least regarding the cameras. But I have to admit I'm
genuniely impressed by their lenses and quality of their electronic
wizardry. A 300/4.0 lens with stabilizer (yes, you can handhold it at 1/60
second and get immaculate results) not to mention their 45 and 90 mm shift
and tilt lenses. Why haven't Olympus included tilt features on some lenses?
I certainly would have rushed to the store.
Ulf Westerberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|