Lex Jenkins wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to wonder about the moral integrity and sexual orientation of
> the person who is so offended by the mere nudity of a child as to consider
> it pornographic.
Don't laugh but possession of same in Canada can invite criminal
prosecution depending upon the orientation of the photos. It has been
suggested that the famous Norman Rockwell picture of the young boy
standing on a chair, bending forward with his pants down and having his
buttocks examined by the grand fatherly looking family doctor is a tad
risqué. As for the soft and slightly out of focus images of naked 8 to
12 year old girls by some English photographer [Bailey?] they might be
held to be over the line.
So much for political correctness north of the 49th.
jh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|