Hi there,
I've been using Provia 100F for several long exposures with good results.
Lighting sources were the ambient light in the Norvegian mountains just before
midnight, late evening light in autumn in Denmark, the latter supplied with
different articical light sources. I've never observed reciprocity problems
with that film.
I'll place some more shots on my homepage later. For the time being there is a
list of files with some shots here, from a ski vacation in Norway in february:
www.i4.auc.dk/berndm/norge . Among other pictures, there is one with the full
moon shining onto our cabin. Scans are small and not very sharp. Pictures taken
with an OM2, the 35-70 3.5-4.5 and the 24 2.8.
I'll be off-list for the next week; I'm on my way out to shoot a rock festival.
Best regards,
Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olaf Greve" <o.greve@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] Taking pictures of Mars
> Hi Oben,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> > I thought reciprocity was a good point of Provia 100F.
>
> I've been told so too. Basically, I wasn't trying to imply that Provia 100F
> performs poorly in this respect, but rather I was interested in finding out
> just how badly Provia 100F is influenced once it exceeds the reciprocity
> boundaries (i.e. when taking shots using exposure times of 2+ minutes).
>
> Furthermore, I was interested in means of working around reciprocity failure
> in general.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers!
> Olafo
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|