No no,
It's a picture of one lens lying on a mirroring surface. Look at the
difference in apparent size and the relation of the various recognizable
bits on each image
Moose
Winsor Crosby wrote:
It's a mirror site.
Tom
On Wednesday, February 13, 2002 at 13:37, john.oregan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "[OM] Is this for Stereo Astronomy?" saying:
Hi
This one had me wondering for a little while, looks like a 'twin
500mm'
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1332738625
then I looked at the sellers other auctions..
JohnOR
>
>
Could be. Binocular viewing of the heavens is done, but not
frequently, because of the increased cost. Once large binoculars are
left behind, people experiment with binocular splitters on a regular
telescope requiring duplication of eyepieces. Even though you end up
with the same amount of light it is split between two eyes which seem
to be better than one plus the strain of keeping one eye shut is
eliminated. I doubt that stereo photography would work since
essentially everything is at infinity. An experiment that failed?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|