| Subject: | Re: [OM] Poster size on the Epson 1270 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Apr 2002 19:08:03 -0400 |
Oh, yes you do :) Either the 21/2 or 21/3.5. Both excellent, just different. I love the 21. Tom > lovely shot!! > > :Doro > (no, I don't need a 2/21, no, I don't need.................) > > > Tom Scales wrote: > > > > http://www.scalesfamily.com/g13-2n-03.jpg > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Don?t sneeze at 3.5 Macro, 35/2 MC, Larry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Poster size on the Epson 1270, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Poster size on the Epson 1270, Dorothée Rapp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Poster size on the Epson 1270, Dorothée Rapp |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
