You are obviously paying more attention to the mechanics than the optics
Chris.
Or didn't you notice Moose's quote from the Tamron manual for the 60-300?
:->
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Barker
Sent: 11 September 2003 18:36
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] My name is bill and I'm an enabler
I received my 60-300 today, sans A2 mount which I am having to buy new
;-(. It is in pretty good nick, so I believe that I have got a good
deal at £60 sterling. It's a pretty heavy beast (870g), but not so
heavy that I would not mind taking your 1.4x off your hands Piers... ;-)
Chris
On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 20:07 Europe/London, Piers Hemy wrote:
> Yep, that is the same one I have - 140F, not actually marked SP on the
> lens
> (unlike the 2x).
>
> It will not fit the 17 or the 35-80. I tried it.
>
> It will fit the 60-300 and 500. I tried it.
>
> I don't know which others it will/won't fit. I haven't tried it.
>
> That is a good price, BTW.
>
> Piers
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|