Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E1 vs E300

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs E300
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:59:54 -0500
The 7-14 is currently showing a $1,800 selling price.  Yikes!

The 11-22 is a super lens, and one that I've never been sorry that I bought.  
The 7-14 is overkill for most of us mortals.  If I want more FOV than a 22mm 
equiv, I'll put my 15mm lens on my Leica.  For the number of times that I'd 
really NEED the 7-14, it's much more cost effective.

If you want shallow DOF, buy the 150/2.0, or one of the new PMA, f/2.0 zooms 
that have been rumoured.  But the 50-200/2.8-3.5 is very nice at shallow DOF,  
It's like a Zuiko 180/2.8 shot almost wide open, which produces very nice 
results.

Skip


----- Original Message ---------------

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs E300
   From: Daniel Mitchell <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:45:27 -0700
     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx

>C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Of course I bought the 11-22 
>> immediately to enjoy the fun of super wide. 
>
>  That's one thing that's keeping me from getting into DSLR just yet -- 
>Moose "sees in telephoto", whereas I "see in wide-angle", and so I'd be 
>wanting to buy the 11-22 if I bought an E1/E300, but those are pretty 
>expensive. (now, when the 7-14 comes out, that's going to be very tempting!)
>
>> I like DOF control (mostly shallow DOF), less than 
>> 1% of my shots are at F8 or below.
>
>  That's another thing -- don't you get also more DOF with smaller 
>(digital) sensors because of the optics of it all?
>
>  One thing that I've found with the Coolpix I have is that I get a lot 
>of DOF -- which is handy for macro shots, I've taken way too many of 
>those with my OMs where the DOF is so tiny you can't see anything -- but 
>it's bad for portraits or isolating things against the background, and 
>there's not really the fast lenses for that sort of thing yet. Shutter 
>speed, sure, I like being able to dial ISO up and down if it's dark 
>(because a grainy but sharp shot is better than a smooth but blurred 
>shot, imho), but that's not the only thing that you get with a fast lens.
>
>  -- dan
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz