Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E1 vs E300

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs E300
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:21:26 +0800
Here are the last two at 20 and 24mm:

http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_4348.CR2
http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_4349.CR2

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I downloaded those fine. for anyone else who downloads them, file
> extensions can get weird, at least on my machine.  With Netscape, it
> tries to add a .tiff extension,
>
> IMG_4351.CR2.tiff, while IE proposes IMG_4351.tiff. Neither is correct.
> Perhaps it is because I don't have an app that tells XP what a 'CR2' file
> extension is?
>
> Anyway, after applying the latest CameraRaw update to PS, they convert
> fine. Exposure of -1 on the conversion centers the histogram. Certainly
> nice and wide. At 50% on my screen, they look quite good. At 100%, some
> areas look a bit 'smeary'. It's going to take me a bit to digest, but it's
> worthwhile. Thanks for the opportunity.
>
> My e-mail can take large attachments if no one else is interested.
>
> Thanks,
>   Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz