Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E1 vs E300

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs E300
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:03:06 -0800
Well, Pentax manages to put all that and autofocus in a one pound body. 
But you are right, I think, if you are talking about grafting digital 
onto the mechanical OM body. It would probably have looked very tall 
like the cameras Nikon, Fuji, and Kodak developed from the N80 film 
body.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Daniel Mitchell wrote:

>   Secondly, though, say they did make the body the same size as an OM
> body, and they left all the OM controls in place -- there's still some
> things that would be missing, because there's stuff that a digital can
> do that regular film cameras don't have to worry about -- the screen 
> has
> to go somewhere, the buttons for view/delete images have to go
> somewhere, colour balance, etc. I'm not sure how you could add that to
> an OM body and still have it usable, sadly.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz