A 3200dip scanner with 10% MTF is still a 3200dip scanner, but then it will
provide very soft result. I'm sure the scanner was in the low MTF range. My
4000dpi scanning shown much better details including grain of film are seen
very well.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt"
>I think it's not a good assumption about the lens. This particular lens
> has a pretty good weighted MTF score (3.6) on Photodo tests and
> performance is relatively even across all focal lengths. Not up to the
> 50/1.4 but probably good enough for this test. And even if the 3200 dpi
> scanner was only delivering 2400 dpi perfromance it should just about
> equal the D30's resolution.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> Sorry, you didn't catch the point. The bottle neck is the scanner, it
>> provide poor resolution for the film, how can we compare?
>>
>> For the 100-400 test, the lens could be the bottle neck, say for example
>> it
>> only provide 10lp/mm how can it use for test resolution of two recording
>> media that has much better resolution than the lens (ok, it is just an
>> assumption but they should use the 50/1.4 stop down to make the test like
>> dpreview.)
>>
>> C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|