> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Well, check this paper by Rothman of MIT.
> <http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/99/7/4167>
>
> ...
> What does this isolated paper prove? Nothing except that all of the
> data doesn't agree with the hypothesis and all of the ducks aren't
> lined
> up in a row.
Interesting, but it seems the reliability and accuracy of his methods
(isotopic ratios) are not nearly as robust as the more direct methods
used for the past 800,000 years (gas and pollen trapped in ice
cores), which indicate a very strong correlation between CO2 and
temperature.
In other words, the farther back you look, the fuzzier things get.
:::: If you succumb to the temptation of using violence in the
struggle, unborn generations will be the recipients of a long and
desolate night of bitterness, and your chief legacy to the future
will be an endless reign of meaningless chaos. - Martin Luther King Jr.
:::: Jan Steinman <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Item/99-0590-18>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|