We got that. Preferential voting for lower houses and Proportional
for upper.
And we use cutting edge technology for voting - a pencil.
(I believe that try as you might, you can't get soft pencil totally
off and out of paper.)
Anybut, we still managed to elect and relect a total bloody drongo so
it matters little I suppose.
And I'll cheerfully get into a shitfight with any Orstalian on this
list about it.
But it prolly won't brew up - for some reason we don't get quite so
excited.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(I'll accept that the USA is sophisticated when it manages to elect
an atheist president).
On 26/08/2007, at 4:04 PM, Jan Steinman wrote:
> Some form of proportional representation and multiple-choice voting is
> needed.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|