Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective

Subject: [OM] Re: Portrait PP, Objective, or Subjective
From: NSURIT@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:48:45 EDT
Bob, I'm not the Photoshop, portrait photography or for that  matter, 
computer, guy on the list.  That being said I might have liked to  have seen 
slightly 
more contrasty lighting (a tiny bit darker on the darker side  of her face) 
and have had her body turned slightly to her right and looking  back at the 
camera, which has her look a bit slimmer.  It is not that she  needs it, 
however 
I've not met a woman who thought she looked too thin.   OK, ladies go ahead 
and flame me, I deserve it.  I often, but not always,  slightly soften my 
portraits.
Here is how I do it.  In Photoshop create another layer. Go to  
filter>blur>gaussian blur and add about 25%>go to opacity  and back it down to 
about 25% or 
wherever it looks about right.  I  will then take my eraser tool and erase 
the blur on the eye or eyes, eye  brows and the lips.  When it is the way I 
want 
it, I'll collapse  the layers or whatever it is called when you combine them 
all together and then  print it. Each one will be a little different, however 
I imagine you will  find something you like with this method.  Bill  Barber   
 
 
In a message dated 3/25/2008 11:44:35 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:


Esteemed Wife wanted a mug shot for a press release about a  new  
service she is offering. I don't do portraits. In the past, she  has  
not accepted this answer, and then has not been particularly  happy  
with the results. This time I set up a $5 studio in the living  room.  
Background is a piece of black foam core, 32"x40". She's  holding a  
piece of white mat board to reflect light back from the  wall of glass  
that constitutes one of our living room walls. Mid to  late afternoon,  
light overcast. Very cool light.

My  result:

http://www.bwp33.com/page17/files/page17-1000-full.jpg

For  giggles, I posted a link on the Lighting forum at DeePee, and  
asked  for comments.

One fellow there offered the following edit of the  picture:

http://i.pbase.com/  
o6/67/398967/1/94507703.cGBTBwVK.ShutterBobpicofwife21Mar08edit.jpg

Objective  data:

1. The image does not look as cool on my monitor as it does on  the  
web site or DeePee after reducing to sRGB. I'm not sure why this  is,  
but while mine is cool, it is less cool than it  appears.

2. If I were viewing his and mine on a gallery wall, and I  didn't  
know the person, I'm sure I would prefer his just for the  warmth.

3. The actual fidelity of subject to photo goes to mine. We are  pale,  
northern people still gripped in the icy claws of winter.  It's  
supposed to snow here tonight. Yes, she's wearing makeup, but  not a  
lot. The hair color in my version is pretty much spot  on.

4. The smoothness from pp and the warmth of the skin tones in his  is  
very appealing. His rendition, however, causes a yellowness to  her  
hair, which some might charitably call blond.

I'm not  looking for praise or condemnation or anything in between or  
either  of us. I'm wondering about the current state of portrait  
photography  in today's environment. I notice in the lighting forum on  
DeePee  there seems to be a tendency to turn people into plastic in  
order to  give them flawless skin. The more restrained among them tone  
this  town and show something which appears to be texture, but there's   
still a smoothness that is unnatural. They all say this is what  their  
clients want. Some of them, based on their web sites, appear  to be  
making money at this. I know there are some folks here who do,  too,  
and that's why I'm posting.

The Question: If this  portrait had turned up in your camera, would   
you have offered  the client My version, or His version, or allowed  
her to choose from  the two versions or some other version I haven't  
dreamed  of?

For What It's Worth: Esteemed Wife says my effort this time is  the  
first picture she's ever seen of herself that didn't make her  want to  
look away. I think she likes it. I showed her the other  version, and  
I think she liked that one, too, but did agree that it  doesn't look  
like her.

--Bob  Whitmire
www.bwp33.com





==============================================
List  usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List  nannies:         olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================





**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
Home.      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom00030000000001)


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz