ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:12:47 +1000

He can write.
(Well enough).
He can spell.
He is entertaining.
That counts for a lot.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 20/04/2008, at 8:29 AM, Bill Pearce wrote:

> There is really little difference between Ken Rockwell and any of the
> denizens of dp review lists.

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, (continued) [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Leandro DUTRA [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Larry [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: OM lens mount to film plane distance, Leandro DUTRA
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]