TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:58:04 -0700
So here the same issue is addressed, but much more carefully by  
someone who is well respected in the Nikon community. Nikon D2X vs.  
Canon IDsII. 12MP DX format vs. 16MP FF format. The comparison is on  
page 8 after you click on D2X review on the index page.

http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html

The difference is there, but not huge.





Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> I don't consider that he lied to me about the Nikon lens.  He may  
> have a
> perfectly fine 85/2.  I don't know.  But we got lost here somewhere
> since the real meat of the article is at the bottom where he is  
> favoring
> large sensors or, more correctly, large pixel pitch based on the
> diffraction limits imposed on the sensor by too many pixels.
>
> Chuck Norcutt


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>