Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1

Subject: Re: [OM] E-3 versus E-1 - pictures better with E-1
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:35 +0800
F9-10 is ok for me, over 95% of my shots were below F8 and less than 1% were 
above, I only remember I had a few F16 shots with the 80 macro for insects. 
F22? Never touch that.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt"

> But your OM5D II has small pixels too.  For diffraction limited shooting
> you'll be limited to about f/9-10.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Thanks for Wayne and Chuck's confirmation, then we may only be able to 
>> shoot
>> at F4 with the 7-14 at 7mm :-) I would prefer to use my 16mm fisheye with
>> OM5D II.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Wayne Harridge"
>>
>>>> C.H.Ling <> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Isn't it the diffraction limit is also related to the lens focal 
>>>> length?
>>>> As
>>>> I remember the shorter the lens the faster it reach the diffraction
>>>> limit.
>>>> If you have a long lens, you can stop down more before it reach the
>>>> diffraction limit.
>>>>
>>> Simplistically, the amount of diffraction is related to the "size of the
>>> hole" through which the light passes, so yes a longer lens can be 
>>> stopped
>>> down further than a short lens before it has a diffraction "problem".  A
>>> 200mm lens at f16 has an effective aperture of 12.5mm, same as a 50mm 
>>> lens
>>> at f4.
>>>
>>> ...Wayne

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz