I followed your link to another link on the history of OS/2. Although I
was in OS/2 development from 1985-95 I was surprised at how much release
level detail I had forgotten. The writer has most of it correct.
There's not much I disagreed with.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/30/2010 12:02 PM, |-o-| wrote:
> Me<http://www.comkal.net/>
> and<http://www.os2site.com/>
>
> Personally I rotate computers about every 4-5 years
> but then I use OS/2 and AIX, my wife uses Mac's.
>
> My computers then end up in my museum that includes
> my first PC, a DEC Rainbow 100B with a 5Mb harddisk
> and 996K or RAM (modded with a V20 as well as color
> graphics etc).
>
> My outward facing server is OS/2 based because I'm lazy,
> which means I do things so I can set and forget, at least unless
> a problem occurs (called real life ;-))
>
> <http://www.os2site.com/pages/techinfo.html>
>
> Apart from my collections of HP's IBM's, and Apples,
> I roll my own to suit.
>
> Cheers
> Ian Manners
> "That particular mistake will not be repeated. There are plenty of mistakes
> left that have not yet been used." -- Andy Tanenbaum (ast@xxxxxxxx)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|