I think we'll ultimately be running on nuclear power (perhaps thorium)
<http://energyfromthorium.com/lftradsrisks.html> or, 100 years from now,
very likely things we never heard or even conceived of. What of our
current technology existed (even conceptually) in 1912? Furthermore,
the technology of the next 100 years will advance at a far faster pace
than the past 100 years.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/2/2012 4:13 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I also not worry about the energy supply, sun is a big energy source, the
> scientist will find ways to make use of this resource more efficiently in
> the future. Wind and hydropower are also good sources and running at a big
> scale in China. I just don't like nuclear power but it seems necessary to
> keep the total energy cost down in order to make the country more
> competitive when coal are run out (or cost is too high to extract them from
> earth).
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|