Oh, sorry! My mistake. I thought it was your recent shots so most likely
from the new gears. They were from 5D then I understand why the tone is off
from my expectation.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I don't know why you think they're from an Olympus camera. Most of the
> images are from my Canon 5D shot in raw and processed in PhotoShop.
> Some are from my Samsung pocket camera and JPEG only.
>
> I do have an E-M5 now but will never use Olympus Viewer. Regardless of
> its color performance I very much dislike using it. I'm not sure but
> perhaps have never used Viewer 2. Makes no difference, ACR is my
> primary raw processor and I have no reason to change.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/29/2013 5:41 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Since the images are from an Olympus, I'm interested to see how it looks
>> when processed on Viewer 2 with minimum adjustment. My experiences with
>> Viewer 2 have been mostly good.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks, yes, that and several others need some work. I'm not sure what
>>> happened with that one. Some had exposure errors and needed a lot of
>>> bit bending but that one is fair looking in raw form with just slight
>>> overexposure.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>> On 3/28/2013 10:30 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>>> Chuck, there are many beautiful sceneries and you have captured them
>>>> very
>>>> nicely!
>>>>
>>>> I have a feeling that a few of them could use more contrast. I played a
>>>> little with the first image:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/dunfermline%20img_8157e_stda.jpg
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I prefer a lower JPEG compression for these detailed sceneries.
>>>>
>>>> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
