How about a Pentax 645 as a hardware solution.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/22/2015 6:40 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Apples and Oranges Moose writes:
<<I suggest you not confuse an ambitious, independent, purely software
solution with a reach that apparently doesn't manage to match its grasp
with a <<hardware based solution that has already been proven by another
manufacturer on a different sensor size.
Yeh, that little outfit with what appears to be one main developer bit
off quite a bit. Some of the pattern issues seems to be a problem with the
de-bayerization and nothing to do with the super-resolution algorithm.
There seems to be no other options for this type of multi-shot
resoltuion enhancement outside of complex plug-ins for matlab which look
like waaaay too much work.
Curiously looking at the algorithm and comments from the developer,
using a hardware approach with known fixed displacements of the sensor
while the cam is locked down solid on a pod should
allow for more consistent enhancement of detail closer to the
theoretical maximum---bodes well for the new Oly. Currently 6-8 raw
files generally max out the detail enhancement with Photoacute though
noise always go down a bit more with more files. I don't think the Oly
and Photoacute approaches will be dramatically different in the overall
algorithm used . Comparison is more like......
Tangerines and oranges, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|