Would you advise getting an 3.6 35-70 zoom in place of the f4 zoom I
already own, or is the difference negligible? I am going on holidays to
Europe at the end of this month.
Tony Aguado, East Maitland, Australia
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, 7 June 1998 17:52
Subject: Re: [OM] 35-70mm Zoom lenses
>I would go for the f3.6. You won't be sorry for paying for quality
>optics. Also, the 3.6 is brighter and easier to focus (almost twice as
>bright at 70mm - 3.6 vs 4.8).
>
>John
>
>On Sat, 6 Jun 1998 KenK1ZYW@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> I am going on a trip to Greece and the islands in three weeks. I will be
>> bringing my OM2 and find that it would be good to have a 35-70mm zoom for
>> travel photo's.
>>
>> The 35-70mm/f3.6 is about $225; but, The new OM2000 comes with a new
35-70
>> that is f3.5-4.8 with about half the weight and about $75 less cost if
bought
>> separately.
>>
>> Please help me decide if the added cost and weight of the f3.6 is worth
it? Is
>> the image quality superior?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ken
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|