Anyone else have an opinion on this (1.4 vs 1.8 as a lens, not
loupe)? I was considering getting rid of my 1.8, as I have both
and only need one.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith (R.K.) Berry <keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Arcane Question No. 1: 50/1.8 as loupe
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joel Wilcox
>Subject: Re: [OM] Arcane Question No. 1: 50/1.8 as loupe
>
>
>>My SC 50/1.8 seems a bit sharper than my 50/1.4...
>>
>When I bought my OM-2n new in the '80s I asked the dealer how much extra it
>would cost with the f1.4 50. He said "Don't consider it. Even if they were
>the same price, the f1.8 is the better lens." The possibility of using
>either as a loupe didn't arise though!
>
>Regards,
>Keith (Birmingham, UK)
>keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|