Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] A Flatbed Question

Subject: Re: [OM] A Flatbed Question
From: "Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:10:46 +0800
Dear Mr Ling

We use an Epson perfection 610 scanner in the office. This is a low end
model. Would you know how the performance level of this stands in comparison
to the Umax 1220s?

Is this adequate for scanning photos to print out on an inkjet with quality
like the demo prints made by Epson given to stores for customer sales?

Regards

Titoy


----- Original Message -----
From: C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] A Flatbed Question


> What really count is the D-Max of a scanner, the bit depth is nothing if
you
> have a noise scanner. I have a 42 bit UMAX 1220s, the noise is very high
for
> slides and it cannot retrieve the shadow details very well, but it is
> excellent for scanning photo or reflective media though.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> > In a message dated 2/10/01 6:51:26 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx
> > writes:
> >
> > > Today I saw a much newer model from Umax advertised with the same
specs
> as
> > >  mine except it is a 42-bit 600x1200 for only $79. Can any of you tell
> me
> > > what
> > >  is the diff between a 24-bit and a 42-bit model? How does the bittage
> > (like
> > >  that?? LOL) affect the scanned image??
> > >
> > >  Thank you if you can uncloud this dim, Saturday-morning brain.
> > >
> > >  Susan Steele
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz