I agree, color management and device calibration, be it a scanner or a
digitalcamera, are a must.
Alfredo
On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:34 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> You have no idea how difficult to get the right color if it is not
> right at
> the beginning. Being a film scanner users since the N*kon LS-10 in
> 1993 I
> know it very well. Same for the DSLR, all errors (I mean color) can be
> adjusted then why you need one with good color rendering?
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "alfredo pagliano" <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> Saturation can be treated with postprocessing, anyway
>>
>> Alfredo
>>
>> On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:08 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> I found your review short but vey clear, for the color it is same as
>>> my
>>> experience and also my friend who owned the M*nolta scanner. I had
>>> tried a
>>> Scan Speed (the 2800dpi M*nolta top of the line at that time) for two
>>> weeks,
>>> the color was not as accurate and under saturated for both slide and
>>> negative (with original software). At that time the resoluton of
>>> M*nolta was
>>> better than my N*kon LS2000 but the color of LS2000 was much more
>>> accurate
>>> (for slide).
>>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|