Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style

Subject: Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:16:05 -0400
Your treatise on building your "wedding kit" by adding a Panasonic body 
and the 50mm f/1.4 to your E-1 and 14-54 struck me as rather strange. 
So I decided to look over the 4/3 offerings more closely than I have so 
far to see how I would build a "wedding kit" from scratch.

My 5D and Tokina 28-80/2.8 were acquired specifically for shooting 
weddings and other events.  I had plenty of advice from my photo mentor 
ahead of time that the main lens needed to cover moderate wide angle to 
moderate telephoto, be moderately fast (mainly for low light focusing) 
and also constant aperture.  The constant aperture requirement comes 
about from shooting in manual mode most of the time.  You don't want the 
lens changing aperture on you as you zoom.

I had assumed up front that the 14-54 met that requirement but guess I 
had really never noticed before that it ranged from 2.8-3.5 and was not 
constant aperture.  So I looked more closely at the Zuiko 4/3 line and 
discovered that the only constant aperture zooms were the 14-35 and 
35-100 f/2.0 optics.  Very nice and fast but with price tags of $1850 
and $2050... about 5 times the price of my Tokina 28-80/2.8

I then decided to look at non-Zuiko 4/3 lenses where I discovered the 
Sigma 18-50/2.8.  At $419 I thought that was the solution until I 
realized that this lens was also used on all the other cameras with 
APS-C size sensors.  It was designed as the 28-80 equivalent for those 
cameras but is acutally the equivalent of 36-100 on 4/3.  Probably 
workable but a bit narrow on the wide end for large group shots.

And that's where I threw in the towel; when I realized there was no 
reasonably priced equivalent to my 28-80, constant aperture 2.8 
available for 4/3 cameras.  I don't think I'd have chosen your path but 
it was clear that something less conventional was needed.

Chuck Norcutt


Ken Norton wrote:
>> This is an interesting lens. It even has a 'classic' aperture setting ring!
>> But, strangely, I'm not a fan of the 50mm-equiv. FOV.
> 
> 
> As a general rule I am not either.  I prefer 35mm over 50mm.  But try to
> find a fast 35mm equivalent in 4/3 mount.  It's almost enough to drive me
> over to the dark side and flirt with financial disaster to get the M9 with
> 35 F1.4.
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz