Acer V wrote blowing my horn!
>
> >>>I don't create thumbnails of my images. Instead, I use the "width" and
> "height" parameters in the HTML "img" tage to define a thumbnail size.
> Saves a bit of disk space, and I find it easier to do it that way. Of
> course, YMMV.<<<
>
> isn't the whole point of theumbnails to load like fire, quickly, so that
> the viewer cna chose which one he wants to see fullsize? if you use the
> img tags to change (reduce) the dimensions, you're still loading the full
> large file, taking forever for all but those with broadband....
>
> and to warren: re my last psost about filze size, i did it again,
> downloading a few thumbs off the main page, three different ones:
>
> filename jpg size gif size
> 013_small 4kb 7kb
> 051_small 4kb 7kb
> 179_small 4kb 6kb
>
> hope john hudson dind't mind this quick experiment. it was a randomly
> selected website with thumbs on the front page. so, unless there is a
> specific need for gif format, i'd suggest sticking with jpg. that's my
> US$.02 money back guaranteed. :)
......not in the least!
xoom is very slow loading or it is here in BC. Try the same set of pages
at
http://jahudson.tripod.com
jh
>
> /Acer V
> --
> dum spiro, spero
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|