ML Archiv: RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?

Subject:	RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?
From:	"Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:58:24 -0500

Hmmm, will it keep up with the 85/2 for sharpness and wide open
performance?

<snip>

If you are willing to consider third-party lenses, the 28 mm Kiron f/2
is an excellent lens.  Cheap, too ($50~$90 USD).


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, (continued) RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Ian Manners RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Ian Manners Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Tom Scales RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Tom Scales RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Richard F. Man RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Bill Stanke RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries <= Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Bill Stanke RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Bill Stanke [OM] Man! I love the 85/2!, Robert Gries Re: [OM] Man! I love the 85/2!, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Man! I love the 85/2!, John A. Lind RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Larry J. Clark Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Jim Couch RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Jim Couch

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Question on 20/2 and 38/2.8 macro lenses, Daan Kalmeijer
Next by Date:	[OM] the 20/2 and 38/2.8 macro lenses, William Sommerwerck
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Bill Stanke
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Bill Stanke
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]