Hmmm. I read this and am ... surprised. Doubtful too, but his methodology
seems pretty good for what he's doing. Of course, he finally admits that if
you want large prints, the Canon image fails. And, more importantly to me,
he has only compared an ink jet print from an Imacon scan of the 6x7 film.
He then flatly states that 'inkjet prints surpass chemical prints in every
respect.' HUH? Does anyone else agree with this? I'll put a Cibachrome up
against an inkjet anytime, all else equal.
OM content - hey, Olympus - you've said that digital sensors are too small
for 35mm lenses to make good use of. The Canon has a sensor the same size
as 35mm film. Hey, Olympus ... what's your response to this? ...
George
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Winsor Crosby
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 8:08 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Medium Format vs. Digital
>
>
> It has already begun. See:
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml
>
>
>
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|