Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:23:04 -0400
Depends on what you mean by "halfway point".  I take the halfway point 
to be the one that results in an *area* 1/2 the size of the next step up 
and double the size of the next step down.  Using that as the measure 
the halfway point between 100 and 200mm is determined by applying the 
square root of 2, either 100 * 1.41 or 200 / 1.41 and gives midpoint 
focal length as 141mm.  The midpoint between 200 and 400 is twice that 
or 282mm.

For a baseline "normal" lens of 50mm these half/double steps would yield 
a lens array of  13, 18, 25, 35, 50, 70, 100, 140, 200, 280, 400, 560

For a baseline "normal" lens of 43mm we would have
15, 22, 30, 43, 60, 86, 120, 172, 240, 344, 480

Most of the standard focal length primes are from the 50mm as normal 
sequence with a couple thrown in from the 43mm as normal.  But now we 
return to the mystery.  We don't typically have either 60 or 70 so the 
prime lenses are misssing a step.

Chuck Norcutt

AG Schnozz wrote:
  > And to add further confusion to this, the 135mm focal length is
> actually the halfway point between 100mm and 200mm.  But is 300
> halfway between 200 and 400 or is it 270?  Is 75 halfway between
> 50 and 100 or is it 65?


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz