There's absolutely no reason the 90/2 shouldn't work perfectly on every
OM body, 4Ti down to OM-10.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
On 3/5/2011 7:50 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Just FYI, as I recall, when I mated a 90 macro with my OM 4Ti, it
> frequently didn't work, and hung up the works so I couldn't shoot
> unless I dismounted the lens and remounted it. It was long enough ago
> that I don't recall the particulars of the problem, but I wasn't the
> only one having it. I wound up using it almost exclusively on my
> OM-2n. I don't know if the 4Ti issues would be replicated with the
> 3Ti, as they are much different cameras.
>
> As good as it is, I personally would stay away from the 90 unless I
> was shooting mostly with 1's and 2's.
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think the 90 is a great lens but that may be partly coincidence
>>> that the first few photos I took with it made me very happy
>>> (simple portraits). I think of the 90 as having a special
>>> personality rather than just being technically a great lens.
>>
>> Excellent point! I agree that it has a personality and isn't
>> "clinical" in how it renders the scenes.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|