As we have found before, Chuck, when discussing your possible use of LR, there
seems little point in doing so if you are already happy with your way of
working with images.
But I could not imagine working with groups of photos from a session or a
holiday, for instance, with ACR/PS. I shouldn't have PS, I use it so seldom.
Chris
On 4 Jul 14, at 23:59, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One could do the same thing with ACR and PhotoShop. No intermediate file is
> required, that's just my own choice of work flow. In Lightroom you can
> adhere to the view that you're working against the raw file only since the
> only things you're doing are what can be done by ACR. What gets done to a
> file in PhotoShop can't necessarily be expressed except by a multi-layered
> version of the edited file.
>
> I can't argue that Lightroom can do it cheaper than PhotoShop and that's fine
> if LR's limited editing is sufficient. But it's not sufficient for me.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|